Information on Result #567917
There is no linear OOA(2232, 209, F2, 3, 133) (dual of [(209, 3), 395, 134]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2232, 209, F2, 2, 133) (dual of [(209, 2), 186, 134]-NRT-code), but
- 33 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2199, 209, F2, 100) (dual of [209, 10, 101]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(299, 108, F2, 50) (dual of [108, 9, 51]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(249, 57, F2, 25) (dual of [57, 8, 26]-code), but
- “BJV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(249, 57, F2, 25) (dual of [57, 8, 26]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(299, 108, F2, 50) (dual of [108, 9, 51]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.