Information on Result #568505
There is no linear OOA(349, 35, F3, 3, 40) (dual of [(35, 3), 56, 41]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(349, 35, F3, 2, 40) (dual of [(35, 2), 21, 41]-NRT-code), but
- 22 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(327, 35, F3, 18) (dual of [35, 8, 19]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 16, F3, 6) (dual of [16, 7, 7]-code), but
- “vE2†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 16, F3, 6) (dual of [16, 7, 7]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.