Information on Result #569563
There is no linear OOA(3136, 164, F3, 3, 88) (dual of [(164, 3), 356, 89]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3136, 164, F3, 2, 88) (dual of [(164, 2), 192, 89]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3135, 164, F3, 87) (dual of [164, 29, 88]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(3134, 150, S3, 87), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1998 191076 053927 805178 143382 564872 985089 052204 487349 698881 740338 723055 870219 / 227413 116931 > 3134 [i]
- OA(329, 164, S3, 14), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(329, 163, S3, 14), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 69 685080 318363 > 329 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(329, 163, S3, 14), but
- OA(3134, 150, S3, 87), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.