Information on Result #570829
There is no linear OOA(3202, 222, F3, 3, 134) (dual of [(222, 3), 464, 135]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3202, 222, F3, 2, 134) (dual of [(222, 2), 242, 135]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3200, 222, F3, 132) (dual of [222, 22, 133]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(368, 89, S3, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 382869 271658 659016 501421 251365 993917 662001 / 1091 802985 > 368 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(368, 89, S3, 44), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.