Information on Result #572485
There is no linear OOA(3250, 257, F3, 3, 168) (dual of [(257, 3), 521, 169]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OA(3250, 257, F3, 168) (dual of [257, 7, 169]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(382, 88, F3, 56) (dual of [88, 6, 57]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(380, 86, F3, 54) (dual of [86, 6, 55]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(326, 31, F3, 18) (dual of [31, 5, 19]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(38, 12, F3, 6) (dual of [12, 4, 7]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(326, 31, F3, 18) (dual of [31, 5, 19]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(380, 86, F3, 54) (dual of [86, 6, 55]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.