Information on Result #573358
There is no linear OOA(4138, 167, F4, 3, 101) (dual of [(167, 3), 363, 102]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4138, 167, F4, 2, 101) (dual of [(167, 2), 196, 102]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4136, 167, F4, 99) (dual of [167, 31, 100]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(4135, 149, S4, 99), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2 040610 487096 181427 758937 498317 933435 839690 422249 792187 355243 784188 300883 648114 289820 041216 / 970 822125 > 4135 [i]
- OA(431, 167, S4, 18), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 10 709160 698850 412098 268143 898591 232000 / 2 251884 149854 892341 > 431 [i]
- OA(4135, 149, S4, 99), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.