Information on Result #573384
There is no linear OOA(4142, 265, F4, 3, 102) (dual of [(265, 3), 653, 103]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4142, 265, F4, 2, 102) (dual of [(265, 2), 388, 103]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4140, 265, F4, 100) (dual of [265, 125, 101]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(440, 164, S4, 25), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 14 570521 423098 291305 264511 747942 665498 471933 411328 / 11 371893 759058 304198 150255 > 440 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(440, 164, S4, 25), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.