MinT - Information on Result #573485

Information on Result #573485

There is no linear OOA(4¹⁵⁴, 185, F₄, 3, 115) (dual of [(185, 3), 401, 116]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4¹⁵⁴, 185, F₄, 2, 115) (dual of [(185, 2), 216, 116]-NRT-code), but

3 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4¹⁵¹, 185, F₄, 112) (dual of [185, 34, 113]-code), but
- constructionÂ Y1 [i] would yield
  1. linear OA(4¹⁵⁰, 165, F₄, 112) (dual of [165, 15, 113]-code), but
    - constructionÂ Y1 [i] would yield
      1. linear OA(4¹⁴⁹, 157, F₄, 112) (dual of [157, 8, 113]-code), but
        constructionÂ Y1 [i] would yield
        linear OA(4¹⁴⁸, 153, F₄, 112) (dual of [153, 5, 113]-code), but
        residual code [i] would yield linear OA(4³⁶, 40, F₄, 28) (dual of [40, 4, 29]-code), but
        residual code [i] would yield linear OA(4⁸, 11, F₄, 7) (dual of [11, 3, 8]-code), but
        improvement by Maruta on the Griesmer bound [i]
        OA(4⁸, 157, S₄, 4), but
        discarding factors would yield OA(4⁸, 121, S₄, 4), but
        the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 65704 > 4⁸ [i]
      2. OA(4¹⁵, 165, S₄, 8), but
        discarding factors would yield OA(4¹⁵, 135, S₄, 8), but
        the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 1082 768311 > 4¹⁵ [i]
  2. OA(4³⁴, 185, S₄, 20), but
    - discarding factors would yield OA(4³⁴, 173, S₄, 20), but
      - the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 305 996090 287239 486286 > 4³⁴ [i]

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.