Information on Result #573626
There is no linear OOA(4169, 209, F4, 3, 126) (dual of [(209, 3), 458, 127]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4169, 209, F4, 2, 126) (dual of [(209, 2), 249, 127]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4167, 209, F4, 124) (dual of [209, 42, 125]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(443, 84, S4, 31), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 743 432824 923585 138466 079893 608385 692163 936496 473876 252564 706270 846821 427655 153621 009913 103585 162421 132960 451704 728431 099904 / 9 052373 288486 345160 206941 767894 606217 335850 613093 145925 916389 354432 331859 732314 014078 839167 611385 > 443 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(443, 84, S4, 31), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.