Information on Result #573809
There is no linear OOA(4184, 265, F4, 3, 135) (dual of [(265, 3), 611, 136]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4184, 265, F4, 2, 135) (dual of [(265, 2), 346, 136]-NRT-code), but
- 3 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4181, 265, F4, 132) (dual of [265, 84, 133]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(449, 132, S4, 33), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 15 114989 228406 347488 033746 516185 463747 303837 999665 881936 924009 037824 000000 / 45 404812 302889 192810 925950 053918 027049 414939 > 449 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(449, 132, S4, 33), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.