Information on Result #574142
There is no linear OOA(4202, 249, F4, 3, 150) (dual of [(249, 3), 545, 151]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4202, 249, F4, 2, 150) (dual of [(249, 2), 296, 151]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4200, 249, F4, 148) (dual of [249, 49, 149]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(452, 100, S4, 37), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 122286 562316 677400 710065 247950 699724 199256 311251 272039 790450 228019 543203 578727 206911 566962 340550 130811 972817 601855 688395 354953 747543 223204 680493 432832 / 5909 445624 660275 177735 061262 841863 583710 628534 785955 840883 780789 693140 214269 486067 169858 699936 055397 157033 616741 653933 > 452 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(452, 100, S4, 37), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.