Information on Result #574595
There is no linear OOA(4220, 305, F4, 3, 161) (dual of [(305, 3), 695, 162]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4220, 305, F4, 2, 161) (dual of [(305, 2), 390, 162]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4219, 305, F4, 160) (dual of [305, 86, 161]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(459, 144, S4, 40), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 267 525938 139566 369814 585811 354664 265574 017946 230036 512794 828836 515572 789957 038790 441318 522730 123561 422710 374400 / 777 477803 949531 233536 373576 188373 355366 920576 587906 617821 062112 199463 182107 > 459 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(459, 144, S4, 40), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.