Information on Result #574736
There is no linear OOA(4225, 369, F4, 3, 162) (dual of [(369, 3), 882, 163]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4225, 369, F4, 2, 162) (dual of [(369, 2), 513, 163]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4223, 369, F4, 160) (dual of [369, 146, 161]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(463, 208, S4, 40), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 5 853210 937914 115965 830373 633983 054380 602394 595992 687313 196476 039443 785703 042842 624000 / 66248 338389 800632 875754 408934 650630 828021 253383 > 463 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(463, 208, S4, 40), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.