Information on Result #574768
There is no linear OOA(4226, 320, F4, 3, 165) (dual of [(320, 3), 734, 166]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4226, 320, F4, 2, 165) (dual of [(320, 2), 414, 166]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4225, 320, F4, 164) (dual of [320, 95, 165]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(461, 155, S4, 41), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 35 162266 348965 864492 465363 741528 241521 515995 482555 223491 846236 883313 207330 736210 116983 129154 519040 / 6 178619 757792 266774 478203 941876 542733 832278 327110 913669 619231 > 461 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(461, 155, S4, 41), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.