Information on Result #574863
There is no linear OOA(4229, 272, F4, 3, 170) (dual of [(272, 3), 587, 171]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4229, 272, F4, 2, 170) (dual of [(272, 2), 315, 171]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4227, 272, F4, 168) (dual of [272, 45, 169]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(459, 103, S4, 42), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 20 209278 630007 954817 311657 592716 406577 471235 077989 401051 636395 089582 131646 221319 183990 947510 747136 / 59 997456 042944 145499 206694 218235 767252 553003 337898 939171 700875 > 459 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(459, 103, S4, 42), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.