Information on Result #575184
There is no linear OOA(4239, 268, F4, 3, 178) (dual of [(268, 3), 565, 179]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4239, 268, F4, 2, 178) (dual of [(268, 2), 297, 179]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4237, 268, F4, 176) (dual of [268, 31, 177]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(461, 91, S4, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 115457 192596 305257 505080 897617 251271 932542 088555 636975 468544 / 21352 537403 048391 328525 > 461 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(461, 91, S4, 44), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.