Information on Result #575347
There is no linear OOA(4244, 435, F4, 3, 174) (dual of [(435, 3), 1061, 175]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4244, 435, F4, 2, 174) (dual of [(435, 2), 626, 175]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4242, 435, F4, 172) (dual of [435, 193, 173]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(470, 262, S4, 43), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 45 983165 517068 297448 511524 093141 662826 825837 816964 700852 432473 444189 329902 728330 463517 081600 / 32 437855 549903 223644 246089 638836 795109 698224 516577 > 470 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(470, 262, S4, 43), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.