Information on Result #575495
There is no linear OOA(4248, 269, F4, 3, 185) (dual of [(269, 3), 559, 186]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4248, 269, F4, 2, 185) (dual of [(269, 2), 290, 186]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4247, 269, F4, 184) (dual of [269, 22, 185]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(463, 84, S4, 46), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 894450 329286 322020 798598 021001 283152 584338 810439 991296 / 9348 861618 951283 > 463 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(463, 84, S4, 46), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.