Information on Result #575958
There is no linear OOA(4260, 251, F4, 3, 200) (dual of [(251, 3), 493, 201]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4260, 251, F4, 2, 200) (dual of [(251, 2), 242, 201]-NRT-code), but
- 16 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4244, 251, F4, 184) (dual of [251, 7, 185]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(460, 66, S4, 46), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 340 282366 920938 463463 374607 431768 211456 / 235 > 460 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(460, 66, S4, 46), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.