Information on Result #576008
There is no linear OOA(516, 17, F5, 3, 14) (dual of [(17, 3), 35, 15]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(516, 17, F5, 2, 14) (dual of [(17, 2), 18, 15]-NRT-code), but
- 4 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(512, 17, F5, 10) (dual of [17, 5, 11]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(511, 13, S5, 10), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 732 421875 / 11 > 511 [i]
- linear OA(55, 17, F5, 4) (dual of [17, 12, 5]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(55, 13, F5, 4) (dual of [13, 8, 5]-code), but
- “Bou†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(55, 13, F5, 4) (dual of [13, 8, 5]-code), but
- OA(511, 13, S5, 10), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.