Information on Result #576208
There is no linear OOA(566, 39, F5, 3, 60) (dual of [(39, 3), 51, 61]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(566, 39, F5, 2, 60) (dual of [(39, 2), 12, 61]-NRT-code), but
- 35 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(531, 39, F5, 25) (dual of [39, 8, 26]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(530, 33, F5, 25) (dual of [33, 3, 26]-code), but
- OA(58, 39, S5, 6), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(58, 34, S5, 6), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 392089 > 58 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(58, 34, S5, 6), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.