Information on Result #576688
There is no linear OOA(736, 94, F7, 3, 30) (dual of [(94, 3), 246, 31]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OA(736, 94, F7, 30) (dual of [94, 58, 31]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(735, 45, F7, 30) (dual of [45, 10, 31]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(734, 37, F7, 30) (dual of [37, 3, 31]-code), but
- “Hi4†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- linear OA(710, 45, F7, 8) (dual of [45, 35, 9]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(710, 42, F7, 8) (dual of [42, 32, 9]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(79, 14, F7, 8) (dual of [14, 5, 9]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- linear OA(732, 42, F7, 28) (dual of [42, 10, 29]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(732, 38, F7, 28) (dual of [38, 6, 29]-code), but
- linear OA(79, 14, F7, 8) (dual of [14, 5, 9]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(710, 42, F7, 8) (dual of [42, 32, 9]-code), but
- linear OA(734, 37, F7, 30) (dual of [37, 3, 31]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(758, 94, S7, 49), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 10580 743749 861231 293497 451788 690805 914704 925957 518061 849209 488293 043893 822152 954067 592535 777967 / 972 197243 784671 062972 315640 073851 274697 000575 > 758 [i]
- linear OA(735, 45, F7, 30) (dual of [45, 10, 31]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.