Information on Result #577301
There is no linear OOA(8105, 281, F8, 3, 89) (dual of [(281, 3), 738, 90]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(8105, 281, F8, 2, 89) (dual of [(281, 2), 457, 90]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(8104, 281, F8, 88) (dual of [281, 177, 89]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(816, 192, S8, 11), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(815, 191, S8, 10), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 25 427098 382149 761175 126016 / 717528 710051 > 815 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(815, 191, S8, 10), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(816, 192, S8, 11), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.