Information on Result #577451
There is no linear OOA(8160, 266, F8, 3, 138) (dual of [(266, 3), 638, 139]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(8160, 266, F8, 2, 138) (dual of [(266, 2), 372, 139]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(8158, 266, F8, 136) (dual of [266, 108, 137]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(822, 129, S8, 17), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(821, 128, S8, 16), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 008968 613742 170487 095115 575000 563712 / 108734 057573 457133 > 821 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(821, 128, S8, 16), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(822, 129, S8, 17), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.