Information on Result #577468
There is no linear OOA(8163, 353, F8, 3, 139) (dual of [(353, 3), 896, 140]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(8163, 353, F8, 2, 139) (dual of [(353, 2), 543, 140]-NRT-code), but
- 3 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(8160, 353, F8, 136) (dual of [353, 193, 137]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(824, 216, S8, 17), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(823, 215, S8, 16), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 9069 643604 547071 244335 560849 505648 640000 / 15 008917 595182 591313 > 823 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(823, 215, S8, 16), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(824, 216, S8, 17), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.