Information on Result #578045
There is no linear OOA(844, 16, F8, 3, 43) (dual of [(16, 3), 4, 44]-NRT-code), because 31 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(813, 16, F8, 12) (dual of [16, 3, 13]-code), but
- “Hi4†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.