Information on Result #578268
There is no linear OOA(947, 17, F9, 3, 46) (dual of [(17, 3), 4, 47]-NRT-code), because 34 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(913, 17, F9, 12) (dual of [17, 4, 13]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(948, 18, F9, 3, 47) (dual of [(18, 3), 6, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(949, 18, F9, 3, 48) (dual of [(18, 3), 5, 49]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(950, 18, F9, 3, 49) (dual of [(18, 3), 4, 50]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(951, 19, F9, 3, 50) (dual of [(19, 3), 6, 51]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(952, 19, F9, 3, 51) (dual of [(19, 3), 5, 52]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(953, 19, F9, 3, 52) (dual of [(19, 3), 4, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||