Information on Result #579416
There is no linear OOA(2151, 172, F2, 4, 75) (dual of [(172, 4), 537, 76]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2151, 172, F2, 2, 75) (dual of [(172, 2), 193, 76]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2150, 172, F2, 74) (dual of [172, 22, 75]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(276, 97, S2, 37), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(275, 96, S2, 36), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 22708 462595 641194 417680 809984 / 528333 > 275 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(275, 96, S2, 36), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(276, 97, S2, 37), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.