Information on Result #579982
There is no linear OOA(2185, 192, F2, 4, 95) (dual of [(192, 4), 583, 96]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2185, 192, F2, 2, 95) (dual of [(192, 2), 199, 96]-NRT-code), but
- 3 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2182, 192, F2, 92) (dual of [192, 10, 93]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(290, 99, F2, 46) (dual of [99, 9, 47]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(291, 100, F2, 47) (dual of [100, 9, 48]-code), but
- “Bro†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(291, 100, F2, 47) (dual of [100, 9, 48]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(290, 99, F2, 46) (dual of [99, 9, 47]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.