Information on Result #580207
There is no linear OOA(2198, 214, F2, 4, 99) (dual of [(214, 4), 658, 100]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2198, 214, F2, 2, 99) (dual of [(214, 2), 230, 100]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2197, 214, F2, 98) (dual of [214, 17, 99]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(299, 115, S2, 49), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(298, 114, S2, 48), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 141449 524575 866749 536608 130468 675584 / 431375 > 298 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(298, 114, S2, 48), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(299, 115, S2, 49), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.