Information on Result #580314
There is no linear OOA(2205, 245, F2, 4, 99) (dual of [(245, 4), 775, 100]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2205, 245, F2, 2, 99) (dual of [(245, 2), 285, 100]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2204, 245, F2, 98) (dual of [245, 41, 99]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(2106, 146, S2, 49), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(2105, 145, S2, 48), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 727 070369 678229 731686 401086 929362 121333 407744 / 17 521374 765895 > 2105 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(2105, 145, S2, 48), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(2106, 146, S2, 49), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.