Information on Result #580732
There is no linear OOA(2249, 257, F2, 4, 127) (dual of [(257, 4), 779, 128]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2249, 257, F2, 2, 127) (dual of [(257, 2), 265, 128]-NRT-code), but
- 3 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2246, 257, F2, 124) (dual of [257, 11, 125]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2122, 132, F2, 62) (dual of [132, 10, 63]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(260, 69, F2, 31) (dual of [69, 9, 32]-code), but
- “BGV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(260, 69, F2, 31) (dual of [69, 9, 32]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2122, 132, F2, 62) (dual of [132, 10, 63]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.