Information on Result #581880
There is no linear OOA(3116, 96, F3, 4, 87) (dual of [(96, 4), 268, 88]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3116, 96, F3, 2, 87) (dual of [(96, 2), 76, 88]-NRT-code), but
- 27 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(389, 96, F3, 60) (dual of [96, 7, 61]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(329, 35, F3, 20) (dual of [35, 6, 21]-code), but
- “Bou†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(329, 35, F3, 20) (dual of [35, 6, 21]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.