Information on Result #582012
There is no linear OOA(3125, 86, F3, 4, 99) (dual of [(86, 4), 219, 100]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3125, 86, F3, 2, 99) (dual of [(86, 2), 47, 100]-NRT-code), but
- 45 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(380, 86, F3, 54) (dual of [86, 6, 55]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(326, 31, F3, 18) (dual of [31, 5, 19]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(38, 12, F3, 6) (dual of [12, 4, 7]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(326, 31, F3, 18) (dual of [31, 5, 19]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.