Information on Result #582392
There is no linear OOA(3152, 185, F3, 4, 100) (dual of [(185, 4), 588, 101]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3152, 185, F3, 2, 100) (dual of [(185, 2), 218, 101]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3151, 185, F3, 99) (dual of [185, 34, 100]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(352, 85, S3, 33), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 860342 754412 435094 906698 858579 674571 922984 984079 / 127652 777684 493779 532100 > 352 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(352, 85, S3, 33), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.