Information on Result #582598
There is no linear OOA(3164, 265, F3, 4, 104) (dual of [(265, 4), 896, 105]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3164, 265, F3, 2, 104) (dual of [(265, 2), 366, 105]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3162, 265, F3, 102) (dual of [265, 103, 103]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(360, 162, S3, 34), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 68980 367968 436452 870293 317186 511729 045056 682286 749727 903703 040000 000000 / 1 592376 446885 204670 935611 188490 612206 288097 > 360 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(360, 162, S3, 34), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.