Information on Result #583366
There is no linear OOA(3200, 215, F3, 4, 133) (dual of [(215, 4), 660, 134]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3200, 215, F3, 2, 133) (dual of [(215, 2), 230, 134]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3199, 215, F3, 132) (dual of [215, 16, 133]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(367, 82, S3, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 11063 764601 718263 371177 932141 744468 313023 / 98 314060 > 367 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(367, 82, S3, 44), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.