Information on Result #583384
There is no linear OOA(3200, 158, F3, 4, 151) (dual of [(158, 4), 432, 152]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3200, 158, F3, 2, 151) (dual of [(158, 2), 116, 152]-NRT-code), but
- 52 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3148, 158, F3, 99) (dual of [158, 10, 100]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(349, 58, F3, 33) (dual of [58, 9, 34]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(316, 24, F3, 11) (dual of [24, 8, 12]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(349, 58, F3, 33) (dual of [58, 9, 34]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.