Information on Result #583829
There is no linear OOA(3216, 162, F3, 4, 166) (dual of [(162, 4), 432, 167]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3216, 162, F3, 2, 166) (dual of [(162, 2), 108, 167]-NRT-code), but
- 64 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3152, 162, F3, 102) (dual of [162, 10, 103]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(350, 59, F3, 34) (dual of [59, 9, 35]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(349, 58, F3, 33) (dual of [58, 9, 34]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(316, 24, F3, 11) (dual of [24, 8, 12]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(349, 58, F3, 33) (dual of [58, 9, 34]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(350, 59, F3, 34) (dual of [59, 9, 35]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.