Information on Result #584594
There is no linear OOA(3238, 218, F3, 4, 169) (dual of [(218, 4), 634, 170]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3238, 218, F3, 2, 169) (dual of [(218, 2), 198, 170]-NRT-code), but
- 28 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3210, 218, F3, 141) (dual of [218, 8, 142]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(369, 76, F3, 47) (dual of [76, 7, 48]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(367, 74, F3, 45) (dual of [74, 7, 46]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(322, 28, F3, 15) (dual of [28, 6, 16]-code), but
- “HHM†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(322, 28, F3, 15) (dual of [28, 6, 16]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(367, 74, F3, 45) (dual of [74, 7, 46]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(369, 76, F3, 47) (dual of [76, 7, 48]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.