Information on Result #584606
There is no linear OOA(3238, 180, F3, 4, 181) (dual of [(180, 4), 482, 182]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3238, 180, F3, 2, 181) (dual of [(180, 2), 122, 182]-NRT-code), but
- 64 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3174, 180, F3, 117) (dual of [180, 6, 118]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(357, 62, F3, 39) (dual of [62, 5, 40]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(318, 22, F3, 13) (dual of [22, 4, 14]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(317, 21, F3, 12) (dual of [21, 4, 13]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(318, 22, F3, 13) (dual of [22, 4, 14]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(357, 62, F3, 39) (dual of [62, 5, 40]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.