Information on Result #584642
There is no linear OOA(3239, 193, F3, 4, 178) (dual of [(193, 4), 533, 179]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3239, 193, F3, 2, 178) (dual of [(193, 2), 147, 179]-NRT-code), but
- 52 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3187, 193, F3, 126) (dual of [193, 6, 127]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(361, 66, F3, 42) (dual of [66, 5, 43]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(319, 23, F3, 14) (dual of [23, 4, 15]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(317, 21, F3, 12) (dual of [21, 4, 13]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(319, 23, F3, 14) (dual of [23, 4, 15]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(361, 66, F3, 42) (dual of [66, 5, 43]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.