Information on Result #586155
There is no linear OOA(2161, 189, F2, 5, 79) (dual of [(189, 5), 784, 80]-NRT-code), because 3 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2161, 189, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(189, 2), 217, 80]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2160, 189, F2, 78) (dual of [189, 29, 79]-code), but
- 6 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2166, 195, F2, 78) (dual of [195, 29, 79]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2167, 196, F2, 79) (dual of [196, 29, 80]-code), but
- 6 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2166, 195, F2, 78) (dual of [195, 29, 79]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.