Information on Result #586463
There is no linear OOA(2180, 208, F2, 5, 86) (dual of [(208, 5), 860, 87]-NRT-code), because 3 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2180, 208, F2, 2, 86) (dual of [(208, 2), 236, 87]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2178, 208, F2, 84) (dual of [208, 30, 85]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2179, 209, F2, 84) (dual of [209, 30, 85]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2180, 210, F2, 85) (dual of [210, 30, 86]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2179, 209, F2, 84) (dual of [209, 30, 85]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.