Information on Result #586476
There is no linear OOA(2180, 173, F2, 5, 99) (dual of [(173, 5), 685, 100]-NRT-code), because 3 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2180, 173, F2, 2, 99) (dual of [(173, 2), 166, 100]-NRT-code), but
- 15 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2165, 173, F2, 84) (dual of [173, 8, 85]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(281, 88, F2, 42) (dual of [88, 7, 43]-code), but
- “Hel†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(281, 88, F2, 42) (dual of [88, 7, 43]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.