Information on Result #586558
There is no linear OOA(2185, 187, F2, 5, 97) (dual of [(187, 5), 750, 98]-NRT-code), because 3 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2185, 187, F2, 2, 97) (dual of [(187, 2), 189, 98]-NRT-code), but
- 9 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2176, 187, F2, 88) (dual of [187, 11, 89]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(288, 98, F2, 44) (dual of [98, 10, 45]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(289, 99, F2, 45) (dual of [99, 10, 46]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(288, 98, F2, 44) (dual of [98, 10, 45]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.