Information on Result #587252
There is no linear OOA(2248, 250, F2, 5, 129) (dual of [(250, 5), 1002, 130]-NRT-code), because 3 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2248, 250, F2, 2, 129) (dual of [(250, 2), 252, 130]-NRT-code), but
- 9 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2239, 250, F2, 120) (dual of [250, 11, 121]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2119, 129, F2, 60) (dual of [129, 10, 61]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(259, 68, F2, 30) (dual of [68, 9, 31]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(260, 69, F2, 31) (dual of [69, 9, 32]-code), but
- “BGV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(260, 69, F2, 31) (dual of [69, 9, 32]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(259, 68, F2, 30) (dual of [68, 9, 31]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2119, 129, F2, 60) (dual of [129, 10, 61]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.