Information on Result #587475
There is no linear OOA(314, 30, F3, 5, 9) (dual of [(30, 5), 136, 10]-NRT-code), because 4 times depth reduction would yield linear OA(314, 30, F3, 9) (dual of [30, 16, 10]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(313, 19, F3, 9) (dual of [19, 6, 10]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(312, 15, F3, 9) (dual of [15, 3, 10]-code), but
- OA(36, 19, S3, 4), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 51975 / 67 > 36 [i]
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(316, 30, F3, 11) (dual of [30, 14, 12]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(316, 24, F3, 11) (dual of [24, 8, 12]-code), but
- linear OA(313, 19, F3, 9) (dual of [19, 6, 10]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.