Information on Result #587586
There is no linear OOA(344, 35, F3, 5, 35) (dual of [(35, 5), 131, 36]-NRT-code), because 3 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(344, 35, F3, 2, 35) (dual of [(35, 2), 26, 36]-NRT-code), but
- 17 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(327, 35, F3, 18) (dual of [35, 8, 19]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 16, F3, 6) (dual of [16, 7, 7]-code), but
- “vE2†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 16, F3, 6) (dual of [16, 7, 7]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.