Information on Result #588632
There is no linear OOA(3133, 201, F3, 5, 85) (dual of [(201, 5), 872, 86]-NRT-code), because 4 times depth reduction would yield linear OA(3133, 201, F3, 85) (dual of [201, 68, 86]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(3132, 163, F3, 85) (dual of [163, 31, 86]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(3131, 147, S3, 85), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2 959964 272368 355385 131019 565631 322230 864774 663367 805086 508948 978796 443201 / 9282 754000 > 3131 [i]
- OA(331, 163, S3, 16), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(331, 136, S3, 16), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 621 653656 785825 > 331 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(331, 136, S3, 16), but
- OA(3131, 147, S3, 85), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(368, 201, S3, 38), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(368, 187, S3, 38), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 4 185011 256460 307952 313976 653889 690485 861995 490330 218229 391251 955691 449885 824042 401792 / 14773 934323 743575 783185 881134 593137 934301 575737 911449 > 368 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(368, 187, S3, 38), but
- linear OA(3132, 163, F3, 85) (dual of [163, 31, 86]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.